Justices Tell Judges Not to Rule on Major Backers
June 09, 2009
Topic: Miller Curtis & Weisbrod Blog
The U.S.Supreme Court has recognized that major financial contributions from big corporations directly to state Supreme Court Justices creates the appearance of undue influence. THe attached article from the New York TImes explains the problem well - when a large corporation makes a large donation to a justice, and later that same justice issues a ruling in favor of that corporation (potentially saving the corporation millions of dollars), that just looks bad. LINK
In Texas, we have proof of how bad it is. Several law schools professors in Texas gathered together and did a study to determine if the big corporations won more decisions before the Texas Supreme Court. THe short answer is, Yes. Nearly 85% of the time that an individual faces off with a big corporation, the big corporation wins.
There can be little doubt that the financial contributions of the big companies pays direct financial dividends
Recent Updates
October 23, 2009
US Chamber of Commerce
September 01, 2009
Children's toys should be at the front of the list of things that are guaranteed to be safe.
August 11, 2009
Death By Mistake Series, Hearst Newspapers, August 2009
August 05, 2009
Ghostwriting by drug company pollutes the medical science
August 03, 2009
White Coat Conspiracy
Web Resources
Miller, Curtis & Weisbrod, L.L.P.
Main Site
Truck Accident Site
Birth Injury Site
Auto Defect Site
Drug Litigation Site
Other Resources
FindLaw
Thomson West
U.S. Courts
Westlaw
United States Chamber of Commerce
FirstGov
Library of Congress
White House
Internal Revenue Service
Yahoo!Legal Blog Directory
